This is rather lengthy, but is a problem we should all be addressing and considering. I was brought up to respect women. I think the present problem has been created by putting men and women together, and then being surprised when problems have arisen. I believe, and always have, in the word "NO."
By Petula Dvorak, Monday, September 2, 2013
You know how you can get all wrapped up in a good summer novel and have to remind yourself where you are when you put it down? Well, America has made it pretty hard this past week to remind myself that we do not, in fact, live in the brutal 18th-century society I’m reading about, where rape is unacknowledged and young women are treated as disposable.
Let’s take a look at Montana last week, where a former teacher was sentenced to just 30 days in jail after admitting to raping a 14-year-old student, who later killed herself. The Yellowstone County judge said the girl was “older than her chronological age” and “as much in control of the situation” as the teacher, who was 49 at the time of the ongoing rapes. Later in the week, after he was slammed across the country, Montana District Judge G. Todd Baugh issued a statement apologizing for his comments. That didn’t change the ridiculous sentence. But that’s Montana, you think. The judge wears a bolo tie, what can you expect?
Okay, so let’s go to D.C., our enlightened nations capital. Here in Washington, military prosecutors have made their point loud and clear that if you report a sexual assault, they will make your life hell.
A U.S. Naval Academy midshipman who says she was raped by three fellow students last year finally had her case acknowledged by the academy. And she was ravaged by prosecutors. They asked her whether she was wearing a bra or panties that night. They asked her to describe how wide she opens her mouth during oral sex. They asked her if she “felt like a ho” the next morning. What? A prosecutor said “ho” in a hearing?
It sounded like a witch trial. But her interrogation, which ended Sunday, came at an Article 32 hearing, which is the military equivalent of a grand jury hearing to determine whether the case would go to trial, or in this case, a military court-martial. The woman said she went to an off-campus “toga and yoga” party at the football house last spring. She drank way too much and blacked out. The next morning, her back was sore and she didn’t remember much. She didn’t report anything.
“She learned from friends and social media that three football players were claiming to have had sexual intercourse with her while she was incapacitated,” her attorney, Susan Burke, said in a statement when I wrote about the case in June. It was her fellow classmates, who were horrified by the online bragging of the three football players, who reported the case. Reluctantly, the woman told academy officials what she could remember. What did the academy do? They punished the 21-year-old for drinking.
She and her attorney began to wonder if the academy would ever investigate the players. Now, the military prosecutors are trying to make her regret that the case ever got this far. The questions have been invasive, irrelevant and demeaning. Legal experts say they would never be able to go that far — the sexual-position questions, the cross-examination about her underpants — in a civilian trial.
Perhaps this cultural difference explains a recent Pentagon report, which stated that while as many as 26,000 service members said they were the targets of unwanted sexual contact last year, only 3,374 incidents of sexual assault were reported. Those who believe women should be kept out of the military will point to the report and the Naval Academy case as proof. But hold your horses there, Internet Rousseaus.
The Naval Academy case underscores the reasons behind the rising concern over the way the military handles sexual assault cases.
But this isn’t about women in the military. It isn’t about the hidden sexual assault of men in the military. Nor is it about a backward judge in Yellowstone County. It's about America still not understanding the difference between consensual sex and rape.
The woman at the Naval Academy is not pretending to be a prude. She described for prosecutors times in the past when she did want to have sex and consented to it. But the stuff those football players bragged about online — she didn’t even remember it. At that point, it’s rape. Consensual sex happens between two adults who both want it. Rape is about violence, domination and power. It shouldn’t be that hard.
And yet, it still is. Just like in the 18th century.
Thomas Jefferson said in 1802: "I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies."
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not."-- Thomas Jefferson
"When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout." .... jbd
"When once a job you have begun, do no stop till it is done. Whether the task be great or small, do it well, or not at all." .... Anon
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. - Albert Einstein
Television is one daylong commercial interrupted periodically by inept attempts to fill the airspace in between them.If you can't start a fire, perhaps your wood is wet ....
When you elect clowns, expect a circus ..............
Monday, September 2, 2013
Naval Academy case exposes a backward America
Labels:
blog,
chrome,
data farms,
dooley observed,
elena della donne,
face book,
facebook,
free,
germany,
google,
joe dooley,
keyword,
NSA,
russia,
twitter,
yahoo