Debate?

I did not watch the "debate" last night. I don't have my balloon anymore and had no use for all the "hot air." I was convinced of the outcome. I did not want to see "embarrassment," live, on my TV. I watched the Yankees play the Redsox. I knew they were evenly matched. Here are two opinions I value ... jbd


I thought Romney was a blowout winner in first half of debate especially for his specifics and knowledge of issues....Obama wandered often but may have had a slightly better second half because he could spend time on Obamacare....good debate but Romney won, 38-20! - Frank Beckman

Here in the United States, we have glorified such things as the shootout at the OK corral.

If the first presidential debate was touted to be a shootout, Romney was the Earps and Obama was the kid in the background, cleaning the stalls.

American voters-even those who have blindly followed the current president saw several filings in the debate.

First of course is the fact that Obama has no idea what he is doing.

Second, the governor was totally prepared, knew his facts and figures and Obama did not. He did not prepare and he did not know his facts and figures.

If you watched you could see how Romney took the president apart and, more telling, it was evident that Obama knew it too. After being corrected so many times and-if you will-schooled in business you could actually see the body language change as Obama realized he was out of his league.

Mr. Romney did all of this artfully, seemingly not wanting to hurt the president anymore than he had to. But America now sees that there is a definite difference between the two men and one has the experience to help us and the other one is lost without a teleprompter and not used to be in asked questions. - Jim Madison

Dr Earth - Fertilizers 022039 All Purpose Fertilizer